Nestle

OVERALL
Owned	SWI
Rating

Food and beverage company

World's #1 food and beverage company. World's #1 coffee company. Its pet food, bottled water and baby food businesses are also amongst the largest in the world. Founded in Switzerland in 1866 by Henri Nestl.

> About the Ratings

Company Assessment

PRAISE	CRITICISM	INFORMATION
Nestle SA
Palm oil scorecard - Greenpeace In 2016 Greenpeace published a report on the progress towards zero deforestation in the palm oil supply chains of several multinational companies. Companies were assessed on three criteria: responsible sourcing, transparency and industry reform. This company was rated as 'on track'. [Source 2016][More on Palm Oil] Commitment to zero deforestation 5/5 The Forest 500 identifies, ranks, and tracks the governments, companies and financial institutions worldwide that together could virtually eradicate tropical deforestation. Rankings are based on their public policies and commitments and potential impacts on tropical forests in the context of forest risk commodities (palm oil, soya, beef, leather, timber, and pulp and paper). This company received a score of 5/5. [Source 2018][More on Forests] CDP Climate A List In 2018, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) asked companies to provide data about their efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change risk. Responding companies are scored across four key areas: disclosure; awareness; management; and leadership. This company received a CDP Climate Change Score of A. [Source 2018][More on Climate Change] Palm oil scorecard - UCS The Union of Concerned Scientists' 2015 Palm Oil Scorecard scores America's top brands on their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil. This company received a score of 90.5/100, signifying strong commitment. [Source 2015][More on Palm Oil] Palm oil scorecard - WWF The WWF Palm Oil Buyers Scorecard 2019 assesses 173 companies on the commitments they have made, and the actions they have taken, to ensure that there is no destruction of nature including no deforestation along their supply chains; and support a responsible and sustainable palm oil industry beyond their own supply chain. This company is rated 'leading the way' with a score of 17 out of a possible total of 22. [Source 2019][More on Palm Oil] Access to Nutrition rating The Access to Nutrition Index (ATNI) is a global initiative that evaluates the world's largest food and beverage manufacturers on their policies, practices and performance related to undernutrition and obesity. Of the 22 companies ranked this company came 1st. [Source 2018][More on Product Safety] 98/100 SAM Rank This company received a SAM Rank of 98/100 in the Food Products category of the 2018 SAM Corporate Sustainability Assessment. The index is based on an analysis of corporate economic, environmental and social performance, assessing issues such as corporate governance, risk management, environmental reporting, climate strategy, human rights and labour practices. [Source 2018][More on Sustainability Reporting] 58/100 in KnowTheChain Benchmark In 2018 KnowTheChain benchmarked 120 large global companies in the ICT, Food & Beverage, and Apparel & Footwear sectors on their efforts to address forced labour and human trafficking in their supply chains. This company received a score of 58/100. [Source 2018][More on Workers Rights] Human Rights Benchmark The 2019 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark assessed 200 of the largest publicly traded companies in the world from the Agricultural Products, Apparel, Extractives and ICT Manufacturing sectors on 100 human rights indicators. This company's score was in the 50-60 band range. The overall average score was a disappointing 24%. [Source 2019][More on Human Rights] Farm animal welfare The 2017 Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) report ranks global food companies on how they are managing and reporting their farm animal welfare policies and practices. This company appeared in tier 3, "Established but Work to be Done", with tier 1 being the best, and tier 6 the worst. [Source 2018][More on Animal Rights] Agricultural sourcing Oxfam's 2016 Behind the Brands Scorecard assesses the agricultural sourcing policies of the world's 10 largest food and beverage companies. It exclusively focuses on publicly available information that relates to the policies of these companies on their sourcing of agricultural commodities from developing countries. This company scored 69% (fair). [Source 2016][More on Governance]	Boycott call for infant formula Nestle is the target of a boycott because it contributes to the unnecessary death and suffering of infants around the world by aggressively marketing baby foods in breach of international marketing standards. Nestle is singled out for boycott action by Baby Milk Action as monitoring shows it to be responsible for more violations of the requirements than any other company. [Source 2013][More on Irresponsible Marketing] Control of water in North America Across North America, Nestle is staking claim to community water resources. In the worst cases, Nestle's water grab is ruining streams, ponds, wells and aquifers. And in all cases, Nestle's practices are raising serious questions about who should be allowed to control water, our most essential resource, and to what end. [Source 2012][More on Habitats] Plastic pollution In 2018 volunteers collected and catalogued more than 187,000 pieces of trash from beach cleanups around the world to find out which corporations are contributing the most to the global plastic pollution problem. This company was found to be the world's third worst plastic polluter. [Source 2018][More on Oceans] Palm oil sourcing This company sources palm oil from at least 20 of the 25 dirty palm oil producers identified in the 2018 Greenpeace report "The Final Countdown". In addition to deforestation, the 25 individual cases in the report include evidence of exploitation and social conflicts, illegal deforestation, development without permits, plantation development in areas zoned for protection and forest fires linked to land clearance. [Source 2018][More on Palm Oil] Human rights violations This company appeared on Global Exchange's list of Top Ten Corporate Criminals Alumni for unnecessarily marketing infant formula to nursing mothers, pushing bottled water sales, and failing to stop child labor in cocoa fields. [Source 2017][More on Human Rights] Slave labour in Brazil Investigations into Brazil's coffee industry by Denmark-based Danwatch revealed debt bondage, child labour, deadly pesticides, a lack of protective equipment, and workers without contracts. This company sources coffee beans from Brazilian plantations and admits that it is possible that coffee from plantations with poor labour conditions ended up in their products. [Source 2016][More on Workers Rights] Irresponsible Marketing This company is named and shamed in IBFAN's 2017 report, 'Breaking the Rules, Stretching the Rules 2017', evidence of violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes, compiled from June 2014 to June 2017. The report covers 792 Code violations from 79 countries and by 28 companies. [Source 2017][More on Irresponsible Marketing] Animal Testing In 2015 Cruelty Free International exposed cruel animal tests carried out by Danone, Nestle and Yakult, presumably so that the companies could market health claims about their products. [Source 2015][More on Animal Testing] Supply chain practices in China This company received a score of 11.8/100 (retrieved 25-Feb-2020) in the Corporate Information Transparency Index (CITI), a system for evaluating supply chain practices in China, particularly in regards to environmental management and water pollution. Scores are calculated using government compliance data, online monitoring data, and third-party environmental audits, as well as trends in the environmental performance of factories in the company's supply chains. [Source 2020][More on Habitats] Palm oil from Wilmar A 2016 report by Amnesty International found a range of labour rights abuses on the palm oil plantations operated by Wilmar's subsidiaries and suppliers in Indonesia. These abuses include worst forms of child labour, forced labour, discrimination against women workers, people being paid below the minimum wage, and workers suffering injuries from toxic chemicals. The report confirms that Nestle purchases palm oil from Wilmar. [Source 2016][More on Palm Oil] Unsustainable palm oil use This company scores Ethical Consumer's worst rating for their use of palm oil, signifying they are using no or minimal certified palm products, and with no or minimal positive commitments. [Source 2019][More on Palm Oil] Palm oil from illegal sources In 2019 Rainforest Action Network (RAN) conducted a series of undercover investigations which showed that several major snack food producers, including this company, have been found purchasing palm oil from mills that have continued to source palm oil resulting from the illegal clearing of lowland rainforests within the nationally protected Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve in Indonesia. These mills are located immediately next to areas of illegal encroachment into the Leuser Ecosystem and lack the necessary procedures to trace the location where the palm oil they sell is grown, a key requirement for complying with the No Deforestation, No Peatlands, No Exploitation (NDPE) policy this company has publicly committed to. [Source 2019][More on Palm Oil] Promotion of bottled water Nestle has been criticised for the promotion of bottled water and undermining local control of water supplies in communities by turning water into a profit driven commodity. [Source 2015][More on Human Rights] Nanoparticles in food products This 2014 report by Friends of the Earth documents a tenfold increase in unregulated, unlabeled "nanofood" products on the American market since 2008. The report named this company among those with products containing unlabeled nano-ingredients. These nanomaterials differ significantly from larger particles of the same chemical composition, and new studies are adding to a growing body of scientific evidence indicating they may be more toxic to humans and the environment. [Source 2014][More on Product Safety] Nanoparticles in baby formula Independent testing commissioned by Friends of the Earth in 2015 found potentially harmful nanoparticles in popular baby formulas sold throughout the USA, including products by this company. A growing body of scientific research demonstrates that nanoparticles pose threats to human health, raising concerns about their use in food and many other consumer products. [Source 2015][More on Product Safety] Child labour scorecard This website by German NGO Earth Link rates companies on their corporate policies against child labour, production monitoring and accusations of child labour. This company received at least one red mark, indicating poor performance in one or more of these areas. [Source 2013][More on Human Rights] Price fixing in Germany In Feb 2013 eleven chocolate companies including Nestle and Kraft were fined over 60m euros ($82m) for colluding to raise chocolate prices in Germany, while price fixing investigations continue in the US and Canada. [Source 2013][More on Governance] 'D' rating at rankabrand.org Rank a Brand searches the websites of brands for the answers to carefully targeted questions. From this they calculate sustainability scores based on the themes of environment, climate, labor issues, and transparency. Brands owned by this company received a 'D'. [Source 2016][More on Sustainability Reporting]	Soy scorecard - WWF The WWF Soy Scorecard 2016 rates companies on their use of responsible soy, grown without damaging the environment and harming people. This company failed to respond to requests for information. [Source 2016][More on Forests] Response to the Four point plan Nestle refuse to agree to Baby Milk Action's four point plan. The four point plan was put to Nestle in 2001 as a way to call off the international boycott on Nestle products. Nestle rejected the plan immediately and since 2005 have refuse to debate the issue. See the plan and Nestle's response. [Source 2012][More on Human Rights] Update on Nestle - briefing January 2013 Specifics on why target Nestle is the continued target of the boycott; and a look at what Nestle does and does not do in the light of what it says it does. [Source 2013][More on Human Rights] Alledged unethical marketing practices In early 1997, Syed Aamar Raza a Medical Delegate for Nestle in Pakistan, responsible for promoting breastmilk substitutes and infant cereals, resigned from his job. Six months later he issued his former employers a Legal Notice (dated 12/11/1997), attaching nearly 80 pages of evidence of the company's unethical marketing practices. These alleged practises included bribing doctors to recommend Nestle products, being paid commission on his sales, something banned under the code and handing out samples at baby shows. [Source 1997][More on Human Rights] Guardian report, Bangladesh (2007) The Guardian ran a report (2007)'Milking it' by Joanna Moorhead who travelled to Bangladesh to investigate whether Nestle and other baby milk firms were still using aggressive marketing tactics in Bangladesh and found them to be still pushing their product on mothers. [Source 2007][More on Human Rights] Workers rights: freedom to organise (2009) This International Labor Rights Forum report highlights corporations known for violating workers' freedom of association and right to organise. This company was selected on the basis of their ties to violence against trade unions and suppression of the universal right to organise. [listed under Information due to age of report] [Source 2009][More on Workers Rights] Film: Formula For Disaster (2007) The film Formula For Disaster (2007) highlighted many of the problems. Including how baby food companies undermine breastfeeding, the conditions under which mothers are using formula, company promotions and health workers explaining the pressure they are under to recommend company products. [Source 2007][More on Human Rights] Investment in nanotechnology Friends of the Earth's 2014 report "Tiny Ingredients, Big Risks" names this company as one of over 200 transnational food companies engaged in nanotechnology research and development, and on their way to commercializing products. New studies are adding to a growing body of scientific evidence indicating nanomaterials may be toxic to humans and the environment. [Source 2014][More on Product Safety] Previous link with Mugabe The South African civil rights initiative, AfriForum, launched an international campaign calling on people to boycott all Nestle products, unless Nestle decided by 7 October 2009 to stop buying milk from Grace Mugabe ' wife of the Zimbabwean dictator, Robert Mugabe. From 4 October 2009, Nestle stopped buying any milk from Grace Mugabe. [Source x][More on Human Rights] Land grabs in Africa This company has signed a letter of intent (https://bit.ly/2rdBlwn) to participate in the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition, which claims will lift 50 million people in Africa out of poverty by 2022. But according to a 2015 report by ActionAid, the scheme will benefit multinational companies at the expense of small-scale farmers and is likely to increase poverty and inequality in Africa. Launched in 2012, the New Alliance provides aid money from rich countries like the US and the UK, and helps big business invest in the African agricultural sector. But in return, African countries are required to change their land, seed and trade rules in favour of big business. The New Alliance will: Make it easier for big corporations to grab land in Africa: Prevent farmers from breeding, saving and exchanging seeds: Heavily promote chemical fertilisers and pesticides, which increase farmers’ risk of debt as well as damaging the environment and farmers' health: Replace family farms with low paid, insecure jobs; and Prevent countries from restricting crop exports, even at times of domestic shortage. [Source 2015][More on Finance] Cancelled Sinar Mas contracts In 2010 Nestle responded to Greenpeace evidence of the Sinar Mas group's destructive practices by cancelling their contracts with the Indonesian palm oil and paper giant. Greenpeace has documented Sinar Mas repeatedly breaking industry guidelines, Indonesian law and its own public statements, razing rainforests to the ground in its race to produce palm oil. [Source 2010][More on Palm Oil] Plastics Commitment signatory This company is a signatory to the New Plastics Economy Global Commitment, whose goal is to eliminate plastic pollution at its source. [Source 2019][More on Oceans] Climate action commitments As listed on the We Mean Business website, this company has committed to the following climate action initiatives: adopt a science-based emissions reduction target; put a price on carbon; commit to 100% renewable power; responsible corporate engagement in climate policy; report climate change information in mainstream reports as a fiduciary duty; remove commodity-driven deforestation from all supply chains by 2020; develop low carbon action plan. [Source 2017][More on Climate Change] FLA Accredited When joining the Fair Labor Association (FLA) this company committed to promoting and complying with international labor standards throughout their supply chain. The FLA does not accredit the company itself; rather, they accredit the company's labor compliance program. Being granted accreditation implies that their workplace standards program is substantially in compliance with the FLA Code. [Source 2016][More on Workers Rights] Gender equality This company was included in Bloomberg's 2019 Gender-Equality Index, a list of 230 companies committed to transparency in gender reporting and advancing women's equality in the workplace. [Source 2019][More on Human Rights] Animal welfare commitments In 2014 Nestle announced a comprehensive and ambitious animal welfare program, which will cleanse its supply chain of the following practices: confinement of sows in gestation crates, calves in veal crates and egg-laying chickens in cages; the forced rapid growth of chickens used for meat products; and the harsh cutting of the horns, tails and genitals of farm animals without painkillers. [Source 2014][More on Factory Farming] World Cocoa Foundation member This company is a member of the World Cocoa Foundation (WCF), an international membership organization representing more than 100 member companies across the cocoa value chain. WCF is committed to creating a sustainable cocoa economy through economic & social development and environmental stewardship in cocoa-growing communities. [Source 2019][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] How2Recycle member This company is a member of How2Recycle. The How2Recycle Label is a voluntary, standardized labeling system that clearly communicates recycling instructions to the public. It involves a coalition of forward thinking brands who want their packaging to be recycled and are empowering consumers through smart packaging labels. Companies must be a member of the program to use the How2Recycle Label. [Source 2017][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Commitments by 2020 In March 2013 Nestle published "a set of forward-looking commitments to society and on environment sustainability it aims to meet by 2020 or earlier." The company has identified 30 goals in the areas of nutrition, water, rural development, sustainability and compliance in its new report, 'Nestle in Society: Creating Shared Value and meeting our commitments 2012'. [Source 2013][More on Governance] Sustainable Agriculture Initiative member This company is a member of the Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (SAI) Platform, the main food industry initiative supporting the development of sustainable agriculture worldwide. Created by Nestle, Unilever and Danone in 2002, the SAI Platform is a non-profit organization to facilitate sharing, at precompetitive level, of knowledge and initiatives to support the development and implementation of sustainable agriculture practices involving the different stakeholders of the food chain. [Source 2019][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Sustainable Brands member This company is a Bronze Member of the Sustainable Brands Network, the leading peer to peer, learning and networking group designed to support brands in meeting their sustainability goals and ultimately become those leaders of the next sustainable economy. [Source 2018][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Sustainability strategy Deloitte developed a Zero Impact Growth Monitor that was used in 2012 to assess and rank 65 different companies' attempts to become more sustainable. Six companies reached the 'Ecosystem' level: Puma, Nike, Nestle, Natura, Unilever and Ricoh. These pioneering companies have not only set measurable and ambitious mid- to long-term targets (beyond 2020), but have also embedded their sub-policies in a holistic strategic vision of their attempt to minimize their negative environmental and societal impacts. [Source 2012][More on Governance] Deforestation commitment This company has signed up to the World Cocoa Foundation's frameworks to combat deforestation in Cote d'Ivoire and Ghana, signifying commitments on forest protection and restoration, and sustainable cocoa production and farmer livelihoods. [Source 2017][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Bonsucro member This company is a member of Bonsucro - Better Sugar Cane Initiative, a global non-profit, multi-stakeholder organisation fostering the sustainability of the sugarcane sector through its leading metric-based certification scheme and its support for continuous improvement for members. [Source 2019][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Sedex member This company is a member of the Supplier Ethical Data Exchange (Sedex), a not-for-profit, membership organisation that leads work with buyers and suppliers to deliver improvements in responsible and ethical business practices in global supply chains. Tens of thousands of companies use Sedex to manage their performance around labour rights, health & safety, the environment and business ethics. [Source 2018][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives] Greenpeace targets Nestle in palm oil campaign Greenpeace launched a campaign in March 2010 asserting that Nestle, maker of Kit Kat, uses palm oil from companies that are trashing Indonesian rainforests, threatening the livelihoods of local people and pushing orang-utans towards extinction. Two months later Nestle announced a commitment to stop using products that come from rainforest destruction. [Source 2010][More on Palm Oil] Nestle's response According to the Nestle website, Nestle agrees with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and other leading medical and health associations that breast-milk is the best and most natural food for babies. Nestle also supports the WHO/UNICEF's Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding and Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. [Note, despite these statements, Nestle refuse to agree to Baby Milk Action's four point plan. The four point plan was put to Nestle in 2001 as a way to call off the international boycott on Nestle products.] [Source 2013][More on Human Rights] IUF Nestle news updates Latest updates on Nestle from the IUF (International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers' Associations). The IUF is an international federation of trade unions representing workers. [Source 2015][More on Workers Rights] SB 657 disclosure statement The California Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 (SB 657) requires companies operating in California to disclose their efforts to eradicate slavery and human trafficking from their direct supply chains. KnowTheChain.org has examined this company's disclosure statement and concluded that it addresses the majority of SB 657 requirements. Follow the link to see this company's disclosure statement. [Source 2013][More on Human Rights] 7/30 in pesticides scorecard Over the last 60 years farming has become dependent on the intensive use of chemicals. As You Sow's 2019 report, Pesticides in the Pantry, examines the growing risks posed by the use of synthetic pesticides in agricultural supply chains to food manufacturers, and scores companies on their efforts to reduce pesticide use in their supply chains. Scores ranged from 18 to 0, with an average score of 6.1. This company received a score of 7/30. [Source 2019][More on Product Safety] CDP Water Security Score of C In 2018, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) asked companies to provide data about their efforts to manage and govern freshwater resources. Responding companies are scored on six key metrics: transparency; governance & strategy; measuring & monitoring; risk assessment; targets & goals; and value chain engagement. This company received a CDP Water Security Score of C. [Source 2018][More on Human Rights] C+ grade in Chocolate Scorecard Green America's 2016 Chocolate Scorecard rates companies on their use of ethically sourced, organic and non-GMO ingredients in their chocolate products. This company received a 'C+' grade, as they only certify a portion of their chocolate products at present. [Source 2016][More on Workers Rights] 57.1% in Newsweek Green Ranking 2017 This company received a score of 57.1/100 in the Newsweek Green Ranking 2017, which ranks the world's largest publicly traded companies on eight indicators covering energy, greenhouse gases, water, waste, fines and penalties, linking executive pay to sustainability targets, board-level committee oversight of environmental issues and third-party audits. Ranking methodology by Corporate Knights and HIP Investor. [Source 2017][More on Sustainability Reporting] Facing Finance profile This company is listed on the Facing Finance website as a company that manufactures weapons or profits from violations of human rights, pollution, corruption, or international law. Follow link for further details. [Source 2014] Corporate Rap Sheet The Corporate Research Project's Corporate Rap Sheets are dossiers summarising the most significant crimes, violations and other questionable activities of the world's largest and most controversial companies. Follow link to see this company's Corporate Rap Sheet. "One of the world's most controversial corporations. For more than two decades the Nestle name was widely associated with a controversy, including a longstanding boycott, over its marketing of infant formula in poor countries. More recently, the company has been one of the primary targets of the global movement against the bottled water industry. The company's hard-line labor relations practices in poor countries have made it a villain in the eyes of the international union movement." [Source 2018] OpenSecrets.org profile OpenSecrets.org tracks the influence of money on U.S. politics, and how that money affects policy and citizens' lives. Follow link to see this company's record of political donations, lobbying, outside spending and more. [Source 2014] Resource - The Boycott Book [Source]

> About the Icons

Company Details

Contact Details

Products / Brands

Acqua Panna Mineral Water Aero UTZ Certified  Chocolate Allens Sweets & Lollies Allens Mints & Gum Andronicus Coffee Anticol Lozenges Anticol Cold & Flu Baci UTZ Certified  Chocolate Beneful Dog Food Bonnie Dog Food Branston Pickles, Chutney & Relish Buitoni Pasta Sauce Butter Menthol Lozenges Carnation Milk Caro Milk Flavouring Cerelac Baby Food Chokito UTZ Certified  Chocolate Club UTZ Certified  Chocolate Coffeemate Milk Flavouring Country Cup Soup Crunch UTZ Certified  Chocolate Dentalife Dog Treats Dolce Gusto Coffee Fancy Feast Cat Food Fantales Milk Flavouring Felix Cat Food Friskies Cat Food Fruit Tingles Sweets & Lollies Gobstopper Sweets & Lollies GoCat Cat Food Golden Rough UTZ Certified  Chocolate Harvest Gourmet Vegetarian & Vegan International Roast Coffee Jaffas Milk Flavouring K9 Fish Food Pet Food (other) Kit Kat UTZ Certified  Chocolate Kool Mints Mints & Gum Le Snak Muesli Bars Lucky Dog Dog Food Lucky Dog Dog Treats Maggi Packet Meals Maggi Noodles Maggi Stock Maggi Gravy Maggi Soy/Asian Sauce Maggi Cooking Sauce Mighty Dog Dog Food Milky Bar UTZ Certified  Chocolate Milo Milk Flavouring Milo Muesli Bars Mint Pattie UTZ Certified  Chocolate

Mint Slice UTZ Certified  Chocolate Minties Sweets & Lollies Minties Mints & Gum Nan Baby Formula Nescafe Coffee Nescafe Gold Organic certified organic  Coffee Nespresso Coffee Nesquik Milk Flavouring Nestle Baby Formula Nestle UTZ Certified  Chocolate Nestle Cake Decorating Nestle Sweets & Lollies Nestle Milk Flavouring Nestle Milk Nestle Muesli Bars Nestle Baby Food One Cat Food Optifast Weight Loss Perrier Mineral Water Pet Life Pet Care Plaistowe UTZ Certified  Chocolate Pro Plan Cat Food Pro Plan Dog Food Purina Cat Food Purina Dog Food Purina Dog Treats Quick-Eze Lozenges Quick-Eze Digestive Care Rolo UTZ Certified  Chocolate Ruffs Dog Treats San Pellegrino Mineral Water San Pellegrino Soft Drinks Smarties UTZ Certified  Chocolate Soothers Lozenges Starbucks Coffee Sunshine Milk Powder Supercoat Cat Food Supercoat Dog Food Sustagen Milk Flavouring Sustagen Flavoured Milk Thomy Salad Dressing/Mayonnaise Throaties Lozenges Tidy Cats Cat Litter Total Care Pet Food (other) Total Care Pet Care Vittel Bottled Water Wonka UTZ Certified  Chocolate Wonka Sweets & Lollies XXX Mints & Gum

Cheerios Cereal Healthwise Cereal Milo Cereal Morning Sun Muesli & Oats Nestle Cereal O&G Muesli & Oats Plus Cereal

Purina Health Foods Co. Muesli & Oats Uncle Tobys Cereal Uncle Tobys Muesli & Oats Uncle Tobys Muesli Bars Uncle Tobys Breakfast On the Go Vita Brits Some products certified organic  Cereal

Related News

Nestle admits supporting fish suppliers who use slave labour
24th Nov 2015 — Food giant Nestle has admitting using fish suppliers in Thailand who use slave labour with their products ending up in their global supply chain. The unusual disclosure comes after a year long probe, which found virtually all U.S. and European companies buying seafood from Thailand are being exposed to the same risks of abuse in their supply chains.

It comes after some of the seafood caught ends up in pet food, and already some customers are suing Nestle alleging Fancy Feast cat food was the product of slave labor associated with Thai Union Frozen Products, a major distributor.   [source]

Nestle buys Jenny Craig
15th Dec 2010 — Nestle has bought the Australia/NZ franchise of Jenny Craig. Nestle bought the USA based Jenny Craig Inc in 2006 from private investment firms MidOcean Partners and ACI Capital and founders Jenny and Sid Craig. Founded in Australia in 1983, today they have 650 centres in US, Canada, UK, France, Australia, NZ and more. Jenny Craig is the world's second largest diet firm (after Weight Watchers).  [source]

Nestle's palm oil pledge
17th May 2010 — Following a two month campaign by Greenpeace, Nestle, the biggest food and drink company in the world, announced it was committing to stop using products that come from rainforest destruction. The new policy commits Nestle to identify and exclude companies from its supply chain that own or manage 'high risk plantations or farms linked to deforestation'. This would apply to notorious Sinar Mas, a palm oil and paper supplier that Greenpeace has repeatedly caught destroying the rainforest - if it fails to meet Nestle's new criteria - and also have implications for Cargill, one of Nestle's palm oil suppliers which purchases from Sinar Mas.  [source]

Greenpeace targets Nestle in palm oil campaign
17th Mar 2010 — Greenpeace launched a campaign in March 2010 asking Nestle to stop buying palm oil from Sinar Mas, who is trashing Indonesian rainforests, threatening the livelihoods of local people and pushing orang-utans towards extinction.  [source]

Nestle boycott over Mugabe averted
4th Oct 2009 — The South African civil rights initiative, AfriForum, launched an international campaign calling on people to boycott all Nestle products, unless Nestle decided by 7 October 2009 to stop buying milk from Grace Mugabe - wife of the Zimbabwean dictator, Robert Mugabe. From 4 October 2009, Nestle stopped buying any milk from Grace Mugabe.  [source]

Nestle Australia buys Uncle Tobys
26th May 2006 — (AUST >> FOREIGN) Food group Burns Philp and Company Ltd sold snack food business Uncle Tobys to Nestle Australia Ltd for $890 million.  [source]