Starbucks
This company profile is not publicly available
OVERALL |
|
Owned |
USA |
Rating |
 |
Coffee retailer
The world's #1 specialty coffee retailer, Starbucks has more than 23,000 locations in 64 countries. Starbucks does not franchise.
| Starbucks Corporation | USA | website | ||||
Company Assessment
| PRAISE | CRITICISM | INFORMATION | ||
| Starbucks Corporation | ||||
|
This company is listed on the EPA Green Power Partnership website (USA), as using renewable energy for 100% of its electricity use in its company-owned stores in the USA.
[Source 2016][More on Climate Change]
As You Sow's 2015 report, Waste and Opportunity, analyses the packaging practices of large fast food chains and beverage companies, highlighting leaders and laggards in these sectors. Corporate performance is evaluated in the areas of materials source reduction, reusable packaging, use of recycled content, use of recyclable packaging, and actions taken to promote materials recycling. This company achieved the Better Practices ranking.
[Source 2015][More on Packaging]
This company is listed as having best practice on a report card on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality in corporate America.
[Source 2019][More on Workers Rights] |
This campaign exposes Starbucks' history of terminating, harassing, intimidating, and discriminating against employees attempting to unionise.
[Source 2009][More on Workers Rights]
Rank a Brand searches the websites of brands for the answers to carefully targeted questions. From this they calculate sustainability scores based on the themes of environment, climate, labor issues, and transparency. Brands owned by this company received an 'E', the lowest possible score.
[Source 2018][More on Sustainability Reporting]
The Forest 500 identifies, ranks, and tracks the governments, companies and financial institutions worldwide that together could virtually eradicate tropical deforestation. Rankings are based on their public policies and commitments and potential impacts on tropical forests in the context of forest risk commodities (palm oil, soya, beef, leather, timber, and pulp and paper). This company received a score of 2/5.
[Source 2018][More on Forests]
The Union of Concerned Scientists' 2015 Palm Oil Scorecard scores America's top brands on their commitments to use deforestation-free palm oil. This company received a score of 10/100, signifying little commitment.
[Source 2015][More on Palm Oil]
In 2018 volunteers collected and catalogued more than 187,000 pieces of trash from beach cleanups around the world to find out which corporations are contributing the most to the global plastic pollution problem. While not in the top 10, this company ranked as one of the world's worst plastic polluters.
[Source 2018][More on Oceans]
In 2018, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) asked companies to provide data about their efforts towards removing commodity-driven deforestation and forest degradation from its direct operations and supply chains. Responding companies are scored across four key areas: disclosure; awareness; management; and leadership. This company received a CDP Forests Score of D.
[Source 2018][More on Forests]
This website by German NGO Earth Link rates companies on their corporate policies against child labour, production monitoring and accusations of child labour. This company received at least one red mark, indicating poor performance in one or more of these areas.
[Source 2013][More on Human Rights]
The 2017 Corporate Human Rights Benchmark assessed 98 of the largest publicly traded companies in the world from the Agricultural Products, Apparel and Extractives sectors on 100 human rights indicators. This company's score was in the 20-29 band range. The overall average score was 28.7%.
[Source 2017][More on Human Rights]
Friends of the Earth's 2016 report and scorecard, 'Chain Reaction' grades America's top restaurant chains' on their policies and practices regarding antibiotics use and transparency in their meat and poultry supply chains. This company received an F grade, the lowest possible score.
[Source 2016][More on Animal Rights]
The 2017 Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) report ranks global food companies on how they are managing and reporting their farm animal welfare policies and practices. This company appeared in tier 5, "On the Business Agenda but Limited Evidence of Implementation", with tier 1 being the best, and tier 6 the worst.
[Source 2018][More on Animal Rights]
Ethical Consumer in the UK have criticised this company for tax avoidance. What singles Starbucks out as a consumer-facing tax avoider is not just its size and market power, but the fact that its whole business model appears to be built around tax avoidance as a way of competing on price.
[Source 2014][More on Finance]
This company scores Ethical Consumer's worst rating for the likely use of tax avoidance strategies, and has at least two high risk subsidiaries in tax havens.
[Source 2016][More on Finance] |
A US Court of Appeals panel in Boston upheld a lower court ruling that this company owes Massachusetts baristas more than $14m for violating state laws preventing supervisors from sharing in tips pools. The lawyer representing the baristas who worked at Starbucks between 2005 and 2011, said that interest on the judgement raised the total claim closer to $18m.
[Source 2012][More on Workers Rights]
Chile's Supreme Court has upheld a fine of US$50,000 on this company over its labour practices after unionised workers claimed the company threatened layoffs, benefit cuts and illegally replaced workers during a strike. Also, Chile's labour department blacklisted local units of Starbucks over their labour practices preventing them from bidding to supply local government offices for 2 years.
[Source 2012][More on Workers Rights]
As You Sow's 2017 report, 'The 100 Most Overpaid CEOs', reveals the 100 most overpaid CEOs from USA's 500 largest public companies (as determined by the S&P 500 list). This company's CEO, Howard Schultz came in at number 96 on the list, having been paid US$20,091,353 in 2015. According to the report, "Most CEOs have come to be grossly overpaid, and that overpayment is harmful to the companies, the shareholders, the customers, the other employees, the economy, and society as a whole."
[Source 2017][More on Finance]
As listed on the We Mean Business website, this company has committed to the following climate action initiatives: commit to 100% renewable power; develop low carbon action plan.
[Source 2017][More on Climate Change]
In 2012 this company pledged to improve its animal welfare stardards, including pledges to phase out gestation crates for pigs and cages for chickens, eliminate the use of artificial growth hormones, and move away from inhumane chicken slaughter practices.
[Source 2014][More on Factory Farming]
Compassion in World Farming is a UK-based organisation which works with the European food industry to encourage and reward commitment, transparency, performance and innovation in the field of animal welfare. This company won their Good Egg Award in 2009 in recognition for their decision to only use cage-free eggs in the food produce.
[Source 2009][More on Animal Rights]
This company is a member of the World Cocoa Foundation (WCF), an international membership organization representing more than 100 member companies across the cocoa value chain. WCF is committed to creating a sustainable cocoa economy through economic & social development and environmental stewardship in cocoa-growing communities.
[Source 2019][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives]
This company is a member of the Sustainable Agriculture Initiative (SAI) Platform, the main food industry initiative supporting the development of sustainable agriculture worldwide. Created by Nestle, Unilever and Danone in 2002, the SAI Platform is a non-profit organization to facilitate sharing, at precompetitive level, of knowledge and initiatives to support the development and implementation of sustainable agriculture practices involving the different stakeholders of the food chain.
[Source 2019][More on Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives]
The Ethical Tea Partnership was formed in 1997 when a number of major tea companies committed to working together to improve the social and environmental conditions in their supply chains.
[Source 2017][More on Sustainability Reporting]
The 2011 U.S. Beverage Container Recycling Scorecard and Report by U.S. nonprofit organization, As You Sow, rates companies on 5 criteria: general environmental performance, source reduction, recycled content, recyclability, and container recovery. This company responded to As You Sow's Beverage Container Recycling Survey and received a 'C' Grade in the report.
[Source 2011][More on Packaging]
In 2018, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) asked companies to provide data about their efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change risk. Responding companies are scored across four key areas: disclosure; awareness; management; and leadership. This company received a CDP Climate Change Score of C.
[Source 2018][More on Climate Change]
As a result of campaigning by the Organic Consumer Association, in 2007 Starbucks stopped using rBGH-laced milk in its products in USA. In 2009 Starbucks doubled its purchases of Fair Trade Certified coffee to 40 million pounds, making the company the largest purchaser of Fair Trade Certified coffee in the world.
[Source 2009][More on Workers Rights]
California, the UK and Australia have all enacted legislation requiring companies operating within their borders to disclose their efforts to eradicate modern slavery from their operations and supply chains. Follow the link to see this company's disclosure statement.
[Source 2016][More on Human Rights]
In 2018, the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) asked companies to provide data about their efforts to manage and govern freshwater resources. Responding companies are scored on six key metrics: transparency; governance & strategy; measuring & monitoring; risk assessment; targets & goals; and value chain engagement. This company received a CDP Water Security Score of C.
[Source 2018][More on Human Rights]
This company received a score of 59.3/100 in the Newsweek Green Ranking 2017, which ranks the world's largest publicly traded companies on eight indicators covering energy, greenhouse gases, water, waste, fines and penalties, linking executive pay to sustainability targets, board-level committee oversight of environmental issues and third-party audits. Ranking methodology by Corporate Knights and HIP Investor.
[Source 2017][More on Sustainability Reporting]
OpenSecrets.org tracks the influence of money on U.S. politics, and how that money affects policy and citizens' lives. Follow link to see this company's record of political donations, lobbying, outside spending and more.
[Source 2014] |
||
Company Details
| Company Structure | Public company |
| Revenue | US$14.9 billion in 2013 |
| # Employees | 160,000 in 2013 in World |
Contact Details
| Address | Seattle, Washington, USA |
| Website | www.starbucks.com |
